The peer review process is at the core of reputable scholarly publishing and is the driving force behind all publications in LitVerse Chronicles. Reviewers for LitVerse Chronicles maintain the highest ethical standards of scholarly research, and all manuscripts follow a double-anonymized peer review process to ensure quality, fairness, and the integrity of scholarly publishing.

Overview of the Peer Review Process

All submissions to LitVerse Chronicles undergo an initial evaluation by the Editor(s)-in-chief to determine suitability for the journal or book scope. If deemed appropriate, the submission is then anonymized and assigned to qualified reviewers for a double-anonymized review.

The entire review process typically takes 12 to 16 weeks. In cases where the reviewers' comments contradict each other or a report is delayed, an additional expert review may be sought. Revised manuscripts may be returned to the initial reviewers for re-evaluation, and more than one round of revisions may be required before a final decision is made.

Responsibilities of the Editor(s)-in-Chief

• Organize and maintain an Editorial Board, consisting of Associate Editors and Editorial Review Board Members representing researchers from international institutions.

• Ensure that each manuscript submission meets the publication's formatting and submission guidelines.

• Assign at least three reviewers to each manuscript for a double-anonymized peer review.

• Evaluate the reviews and make the final decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection of a manuscript.

• Provide feedback to authors and share the reviewers' comments to facilitate improvements to the manuscript.

Reviewer Responsibilities and Expectations

• Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality and integrity of LitVerse Chronicles. Their responsibilities include:

  • Providing constructive feedback that helps authors enhance the quality, relevance, and rigor of their work.

  • Evaluating each manuscript based on originality, significance, methodology, literature coverage, and writing quality.

  • Ensuring that comments are professional, respectful, and focused on improving the manuscript.

  • Providing a detailed assessment of the manuscript's strengths and weaknesses, along with specific recommendations for improvement.

  • Avoiding derogatory remarks and providing comprehensive feedback, even if the recommendation is to reject the manuscript.

  • Notifying the Editor(s)-in-Chief if they believe they recognize the identity of the author(s), to maintain the integrity of the anonymized review process.

  Reviewers are also encouraged to serve as ambassadors for LitVerse Chronicles, helping to identify potential authors and subscribers.

Evaluation Criteria for Reviewers

• Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality and integrity of LitVerse Chronicles. Their responsibilities include:

  • Providing constructive feedback that helps authors enhance the quality, relevance, and rigor of their work.

  • Evaluating each manuscript based on originality, significance, methodology, literature coverage, and writing quality.

  • Ensuring that comments are professional, respectful, and focused on improving the manuscript.

  • Providing a detailed assessment of the manuscript's strengths and weaknesses, along with specific recommendations for improvement.

  • Avoiding derogatory remarks and providing comprehensive feedback, even if the recommendation is to reject the manuscript.

  • Notifying the Editor(s)-in-Chief if they believe they recognize the identity of the author(s), to maintain the integrity of the anonymized review process.

  Reviewers are also encouraged to serve as ambassadors for LitVerse Chronicles, helping to identify potential authors and subscribers.

Reviewers are asked to evaluate each manuscript based on the following criteria:

• Originality and Contribution: Does the manuscript offer new insights or significant contributions to the field?

• Relevance to Research Community: Is the content useful and relevant to the target audience of researchers and practitioners?

• Coverage of Literature: Does the manuscript provide a comprehensive and relevant review of existing literature?

• Methodology and Analysis: Are the research methods and analysis clearly described and appropriate for the research questions?

• Clarity and Writing Quality: Is the manuscript well-written, clear, and free of unnecessary jargon?

• Organizational Structure: Is the manuscript logically organized, with clear conclusions supported by the research?

Reviewers are expected to provide their overall assessment of the manuscript, followed by specific comments and suggestions. Evaluations should go beyond grammatical corrections to focus on the manuscript's scholarly value.

Decision Process

• Once all reviews are received, the Editor(s)-in-Chief will make a decision regarding the manuscript:

  • Accept: The manuscript is accepted as is, and authors are provided with formatting guidelines for final submission.

  • Minor/Major Revision: Authors are required to revise the manuscript based on the reviewers' feedback. Revisions are re-evaluated, and this process may repeat as needed.

  • Reject: If the manuscript does not meet the standards for publication, it will be rejected, and constructive feedback will be provided to guide the authors for future submissions.

  It is important to note that a request for revisions does not guarantee acceptance of the manuscript.

Contact Information

For any questions regarding the peer review process, please get in touch with us at editor@litversechronicles.com.

LitVerse Chronicles © 2024 by RH GoldenWolf Publishers. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. For more details, visit Creative Commons License.

"To sit alone in the lamplight with a book spread out before you and hold intimate converse with men of unseen generations—such is a pleasure beyond compare."
— Yoshida Kenko, quoted in European translations